When it is Time: Common Law Lawyers Continue With their one week Strike
Oui or Yes of 1972 in Cameroon |
The
historical background of Cameroon has once again been the fulcrum of discontent
amongst its citizen. Cameroon is a special and unique country within the African
sphere and the world platform. The country that was first idolised by Portuguese
fishermen in 1472 who were amazed by its diversity and numerous species of
prawn over river Wouri. This pushed them to call the Wouri “Rio Dos Cameros”-River
of prawns. Then came the Germans who actually defined what was then known as
Kamerun. But the most intriguing thing was the defeat of the Germans during the
First World War. Cameroon like any other German territory was kept as a protectorate
territory under the League of Nations and subsequently partitioned between the
British and French.
Historical Context
In
1960, through a Plebiscite English speaking Cameroon-West Cameroon voted to join
their “brothers” east of the Mungo. The tenets of this reunification were
crystal clear-A federation, Two peoples with same rights and privileges, two
official Languages, Education, Legal etc etc and the the country would be the
Federal Republic of Cameroon. That was only short-lived as barely 12 years after-
on may 20th, 1972 a referendum was initiated to vote against the
federal system for the creation of a unitary state against the wish of the Southern
Cameroonian Minorities and against the principles that were enshrined in the
constitution. This vote that had as Option “OUI-YES” was overwhelmingly voted
for by the majority east Cameroon-La Republique. Southern Cameroonians felt the pinch
of the deception and started crying foul.
The regime in place, didn’t care much and continued with its scheme to assimilate a people. One of the two stars on the flag was removed, the name changed from Federal Republic to United Republic of Cameroon. And in 1984, through a presidential decree, the present Head of State changed the name of the country from United Republic of Cameroon to Republic of Cameroon. Southern Cameroonians felt betrayed, assimilated, annexed, debunked of their identity and saw this as a deliberate and systematic attempt to erode a people of their history, culture and identity. Tensions started building up and lead into a new dawn that started in the early 90s.
The regime in place, didn’t care much and continued with its scheme to assimilate a people. One of the two stars on the flag was removed, the name changed from Federal Republic to United Republic of Cameroon. And in 1984, through a presidential decree, the present Head of State changed the name of the country from United Republic of Cameroon to Republic of Cameroon. Southern Cameroonians felt betrayed, assimilated, annexed, debunked of their identity and saw this as a deliberate and systematic attempt to erode a people of their history, culture and identity. Tensions started building up and lead into a new dawn that started in the early 90s.
Multiparty Politics
The
advent of multiparty politics in Africa and Cameroon. The Social Democratic
Party was born and Southern Cameroonian immediately identified themselves with
its leader –The Tazochia Asonganyi, Prof. Kalle K, Fru Ndi, Ben and Akere Muna, Assiga, Akoneteh
etc. It was some glimpse of light in the tunnel, but after the 1992 presidential
Elections where the SDF claimed victory, the story became different. In a bit
to get their messages across, Southern Cameroons elites decided to hold an “All
Anglophone Conference-ACCI in Buea in 1993. On April 2-3 1993, anyone who was
someone in the Anglophone community in Cameroon trudged to the Mount Mary
Hospital – Buea for a constitutional therapy. This meeting showed that, when
one people with one tradition gets together, they can for once be united. I was
a little secondary school boy during this period in GBHS Mbengwi. My Language
teacher then-Pa Mundam, told us, your destinies would be discussed in Buea this
weekend. To me, this was like saying, we were going to have a new president. But,
I didn’t care much and waited to see what will happen, until when the GCE Board
was created. He majestically came to class and reminded us that, our struggles
are paying off. I didn’t really know the essence of the GCE board let alone an
Anglophone Conference. I was a local Bamenda boy, who knew Cameroon was just a
wonderful world. Then I paused for a while and asked myself, why is it that
almost all newspapers (Cameroon life) with great writers like Francis Wache,
Bate Besong, Mbella Sone Dipoko, Tande Dibussi, Nouck Protous, Victor Ngoh,
Charly Ndi Chia had captions related to this? Then came the version 2 of the
All Anglophone Conference. This time in Bamenda as tradition required.
The Dawn
This
episode ended with little more than the GCE Board and the SCNC, but there is an
upsurge of another set of leaders in the person of Barrister Nkongho Felix
Agbor, Bobga Harmony and Abeng Roland who in May 2015 signed a memorandum in
Bamenda and later in 2016 a declaration in Buea calling on the Head of State to
look into problems plaguing the common law system in Cameroon. Their arguments have
been very coherent, well-articulated and convincing. And as the voice of the voiceless,
it has never become more opportune for them to act in Unison as they have. There
is no Taboo in asking for the rights of the people we protect, there is no
wrong in saying that were are SCNC-That’s our history and so, the entire NW and
SW see in them people who can revert the annexation trend going on. Their
efforts have seen sympathy from other domains of national life within the
Southern Cameroons. The desire to keep our history, heritage and Identity is unconditional.
Just
like Mwalimu George N. Posted on his website(http://www.gngwane.com/2015/05/why-all-anglophones-are-members-of-the-scnc.html)
, Why all Anglophones are Members of the
SCNC: Before and after the All
Anglophone Lawyers’ Conference of 9th May 2015, claims and insinuations were
linked to the real or imaginary interference of the Southern Cameroon National
Council (SCNC) with the deliberations and outcome of the conference. As would
be expected the conveners of the conference have gone at length to dissociate
themselves from SCNC control as if the SCNC was a pariah organisation.
SCNC is a product of the
All Anglophone Conference (AAC) of 1993 and 1994 that brought together
different shades of Anglophone opinion to be crystallized into a common vision.
It was only after the Cameroon government failed to take on board proposals by
the AAC that a new pressure group emerged like it is often the case in
liberation theology to give visibility, potency and geo-political relevance and
space to the Anglophone struggle. It is
here that the SCNC was born. It was no more a liberation of a people as it was
for a territory that freely opted for a Union in 1961 but got short changed on
20 May 1972 with a unitary state.
And
PIET KONINGS and FRANCIS B. NYAMNJOH “The
Anglophone Problem in Cameroon” Also
posit that, With the exception of those who are closely allied to the regime in
power, the Anglophones have become
increasingly aware of the
importance of united action, and the positive response of concerned activists
in both the South-West and the North-West to invitations to participate in AAC
I and II is proof that the old provincial divisions have been somewhat reduced.
The brutal clamp-down authorised in the South -West during the 1993 anti-smuggling
campaign was a decisive factor in
drawing several hesitant members of the elite there into the ranks of the
pro-federal pressure groups; and not even the appointment in
September 1996 of a South -Westerner as
Prime Minister appears to
have affected that - especially since
Musonge made a ` false start ' by appointing as chief of cabinet someone
from the Littoral Province.
The Government's
continued denial of any ` Anglophone problem ' in Cameroon, and its
determination to defend the unitary state by all available means, including
repression, could lead to an escalation of Anglophone demands past a point of
no return.
It
is always difficult to have a united front. In fact not all South African
supported Mandela in his struggles with apathied. It is obvious that some
people will be bought over in this struggle, but the leaders must ensure that
they remain coherent and avoid ambiguity. The resignation of Harmony Bobga as
the representative of the Bar General Assembly in the northwest is an eloquent
testimony and a clear indication of his mental strength and leadership.
Barrister Kemeni and Barrister Nico Halle, might have tried their game, but the
lawyers in the Northwest and Southwest have shown that, they can stand those
intrigues. Some regime fanatics will pick and choose in order to discredit
these actions, but the momentum remains with the lawyers.
Our
government should also know that, it’s not only the legal domain that is in
this struggle, even the educational, transport, health, cultural, sporting
fields are all eviscerated. In fact, in the 1960s, Tiko was an international
Airport, and where are we with it today? The lawyers from the Common Law system
must remain firm and friendly. They have a majority in the bar council of
Cameroon and had a bar council before the la Republique. When Folon refused to
translate the French anthem into English, he did it for a reason. The regime in
Yaoundé has the obligation to respect the constitution of Cameroon. It flies in
the face of logic that, Cameroon in its constitution is defined a bi-jural
country yet, there is no school that trains magistrates on common law practice.
Cameroon still ratifies international treaties with little or no respect to its
bilingual nature. A people pushed to the world, might just negotiate a bend of
no return.
Moses Ngwanah
This is history reawakened! Article is flawlessly written and the facts are clear for any open and unbiased mind. THUMBS UP
ReplyDeleteThanks for your time in reading and I really appreciate your comments. Would be writing soon on some other pertinent issues. Its our obligation to educate and sensitize our people. THUMBS UP too bro
ReplyDelete